If this is the ‘professional’ news version…then how close to reality are the blogs and other user-generated content (UGC) in reporting the news?
Seriously, what do you think really happened at that event? The conflicting stories make it impossible to tell. In fact, I guessed wrong. To find ‘the truth,’ read the NYT transcript. It’ll take 5-10 minutes, but is a very entertaining way to learn something important (IMO).
In the referenced post, Larry Cheng of Fidelity Ventures presents a fascinating look at modern journalism.
In the shadow of Mr. Cronkite’s death, we find ourselves in an American culture that has seemingly lost interest in facts – they are just not entertaining enough.
Our news providers, therefore, are forced to compete on commentary and/or slant. In this race, unshackled by any journalistic constraints, UCG holds a distinct advantage.
So how much can we blame the pros for slanting things, just a bit?
Note: I’m not blaming anybody – just stating the facts…
2 Responses on Reality vs ‘The News’
You act as if this is new.
I have noticed this seince the early 90’s ( I was in my teens then ).
I used to watch c-span to see what was actually said, then trun to CNN to see what they wanted me to believe what was said. Usually it was VERY different.
Yep. By then, the networks had figured out that ‘news’ could drive BIG ratings…
What’s new (IMO) is UGC, and its effect on ‘real’ news. Thus the cycle accelerates.
Leave a comment on Reality vs ‘The News’
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI